Enviar correo
Sin conexión 
En línea 
La iniciativa que analiza la Comisión de Economía del Congreso con
apoyo de banqueros y la Superintendencia de Bancos busca proteger a los
depositantes.
La otra opción del oficialismo es tratar de convencer a Lider de
aplazar la interpelación al Ministro de Agricultura.
Criminal State, Front Page, Politics, Washington Politics
How the Israel Lobby Took Control of U.S. Foreign Policy
July 14, 2009 by Jeff Gates · 6 Comments
In
the early 1960s, Senator William J. Fulbright fought to force the
American Zionist Council to register as agents of a foreign government.
The Council eluded registration by reorganizing as the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee. AIPAC has since become what Fulbright most
feared: a foreign agent dominating American foreign policy while
disguised as a domestic lobby.
Israelis and pro-Israelis object when they hear that charge. How, they ask, can we so few wield such influence over so many? Answer: it’s all in the math. And in the single-issue advocacy brought to bear on U.S. policy-making by dozens of ‘domestic’ organizations that now compose the Israel lobby, with AIPAC its most visible force.
The political math was enabled by Senator John McCain whose support for all things Israeli ensured him the GOP nomination to succeed Christian-Zionist G.W. Bush. McCain’s style of campaign finance reform proved a perfect fit for the Diaspora-based fundraising on which the lobby relies. Co-sponsored by Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, this change in federal election law typifies how Israeli influence became systemic.
‘McCain-Feingold’ raised the amount (from $1,000 to $2,300) that candidates can receive from individuals in primary and general elections. A couple can now contribute a combined $9,200 to federal candidates: $4,600 in each of the primary and general elections. Primary elections, usuall low-budget, are particularly easy to sway.
Importantly for the Diaspora, this change also doubled the funds candidates can receive without regard to where those contributors reside. A candidate in Iowa, say, may have only a few pro-Israeli constituents. When campaign support is provided by a nationwide network of pro-Israelis, that candidate can more easily be persuaded to support policies sought by Tel Aviv.
Diaspora-based fundraising has long been used by the lobby with force-multiplying success to shape U.S. foreign policy. Under the guise of reform, John McCain doubled the financial resources that the lobby can deploy to elect and retain its supporters.
Fulbright was Right
The influence-peddling process works like this. Candidates are summoned for in-depth AIPAC interviews. Those found sufficiently committed to Israel’s agenda are provided a list of donors likely to “max out” their campaign contributions. Or the process can be made even easier when AIPAC-approved candidates are given the name of a “bundler.”
Bundlers raise funds from the Diaspora and bundle those contributions to present them to the candidate. No quid pro quo need be mentioned. After McCain-Feingold became law in 2003, AIPAC-identified bundlers could raise $1 million-plus for AIPAC-approved candidates simply by contacting ten like-minded supporters. Here’s the math:
The bundler and spouse “max out” for $9,200 and call ten others, say in Manhattan, Miami, and Beverly Hills. Each of them max out ($10 x $9,200) and call ten others for a total of 11. [111 x $9,200 = $1,021,200.]
Imagine the incentive to do well in the AIPAC interview. One call from the lobby and a candidate can collect enough cash to mount a credible campaign in most Congressional districts. From Tel Aviv’s perspective, that political leverage is leveraged yet again because fewer than ten percent of the 435 House races are competitive in any election cycle (typically 35 to 50).
Additional force-multipliers come from: (a) sustaining this financial focus over multiple cycles, (b) using funds to gain and retain seniority for those serving on Congressional committees key to promoting Israeli goals, and (c) opposing candidates who question those goals.
Jewish Achievement reports that 42% of the largest political donors to the 2000 election cycle were Jewish, including four of the top five. That compares to less than 2% of Americans who are Jewish. Of the Forbes 400 richest Americans, 25% are Jewish according to Michael Steinhardt, a key funder of the Democratic Leadership Council. The DLC was led by Jewish Zionist Senator Joe Lieberman when he resigned in 2000 to run as vice president with pro-Israeli presidential candidate Al Gore.
Money was never a constraint. Pro-Israeli donors were limited only by how much they could lawfully contribute to AIPAC-screened candidates. McCain-Feingold raised a key limit. The full impact of this foreign influence has yet to be tallied. What’s known, however, is sufficient to apply the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Of the top 50 neoconservatives who advocated war in Iraq, 26 were Jewish (52%).
Harry Truman, a Christian Zionist, remains one of the more notable recipients of funds. In 1948, he was trailing badly in the polls and in fundraising. His prospects brightened dramatically in May after he recognized as a legitimate state an enclave of Jewish extremists who originally planned to settle in Argentina before putting their sights on Palestine.
That recognition was opposed by Secretary of State George C. Marshall, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the bulk of the diplomatic corps, the fledgling Central Intelligence Agency and numerous distinguished Americans, including moderate and secular Jews concerned at the troubles that were certain to follow. Not until 1984 was it revealed that a network of Jewish Zionists had funded Truman’s campaign by financially refueling his whistle-stop campaign train with $400,000 in cash ($3 million in 2009 dollars).
To buy time on the public’s airwaves, money raised from the Israel lobby’s network is paid to media outlets largely owned or managed by members of the same network. Presidents, Senators and Congressmen come and go but those who collect the checks rack up the favors that amass lasting political influence.
The U.S. system of government is meant to ensure that members of the House represent the concerns of Americans who reside in Congressional districts—not a nationally dispersed network (a Diaspora) committed to advancing the agenda of a foreign nation. Federal elections are meant to hold Senators accountable to constituents who reside in the states they represent—not out-of-state residents or a foreign government.
In practical effect, McCain-Feingold hastened a retreat from representative government by granting a nationwide network of foreign agents disproportionate influence over elections in every state and Congressional district. Campaign finance ‘reform’ enabled this network to amass even more political clout—wielding influence disproportionate to their numbers, indifferent to their place of residence and often contrary to America’s interests.
This force-multiplier is now wielded in plain sight, with impunity and under cover of free speech, free elections, free press and even the freedom of religion. Therein lies the perils of an entangled alliance that induced the U.S. to invade Iraq and now seeks war with Iran. By allowing foreign agents to operate as a domestic lobby, the U.S. was induced to confuse Zionist interests with its own.
De los 207 rastros que existen en el país, sólo 7 tienen una licencia
extendida por el MAGA y cumplen con las normas ambientales y de
inocuidad alimentaria.
El mandatario derrocado quiere liderar el gobierno de unidad y rechaza
la formación anunciada la medianoche del jueves por Micheletti.
Facts vs. Beliefs – Today’s Ancient Warfare
Author, educator, attorney, merchant banker and adviser to policy-makers worldwide and Vietnam veteran.
I was directed to this site by iamthewitness[dot]com which is another excellent truthtelling site. Your blogs are insightful and topical. I shall be a regular visitor.
I, as well, learned of this site through http://www.iamthewitness.com. Your presentation is noteworthy, and clearly communicated to me that American’s are in fact the MARK! Going forward, I will be a frequent visitor of this site. Your research is both revealing and remarkably original due to your experience in what you write about. One can only imagine the sacrifices you’ll have to make due to the stance you have taken against the enemy.
On a personal note, I am hoping that Mr. Gates can arrange the production of an eBook of his current Guilt by Association and other writings. Many people now read eBooks due to the technology (loosely called eBook readers) that allows for reading electronic formats rather than bound paper. Physical production and shipping.costs can be virtually eliminated.
Hats off to you for your efforts Mr. Gates!
The best way to get rid of this nightmare that Senator Fullbright foresaw will come if the Jewish Lobby was not harnessed, is a new Law passed in Congress to the benefit of democracy-transparency and against manipulation, as it is now, is public money to finance candidates to the Congress and Senate, prohibiting any contribution from individuals, corporations or ONG’s.
By the way congratulations for a fine article that spells things out, so every American who loves this country can understand how things went wrong and how the USA was taken over by a foreign State and its representative in the country. It is plain treason, costly and tainted with the blood of young Americans, men and women who have died or have been crippled for life, fighting unnecessary wars, the US government have been tricked to engage in.