Aquí viene un artículo que reproduce unos interesantes puntos de vistas del Prof. Chomsky respecto a la política exterior del Presidente Obama y unos comentarios míos en el respectivo foro a lo allí expresado, más unas proyecciones…

Hasta el empiezo del siglo XX, los EE.UU. no tenían intereses geopolíticos marcados más allá que Canadá y el continente suramericano. África, el Medio Oriente y el Asia eran terrenos de caza y zonas de influencia EUROPEAS, divididas entre Francia y GB. Italia y Alemania eran jugadores de ligas menores.

La 2º Guerra Mundial cambió el orden colonial establecido y los EE.UU. con su aparato productivo intacto y bases militares en Filipinas, África, Japón, Oceanía estaban listos para tomar el planeta, discretamente empujados por los ZionTalmúdicos, quienes siendo  dueños del dinero (Reserva Federal,  Bancos y Aseguradoras) y controlando la política monetaria-financiera tanto en Europa como en los EE.UU. empezaron a incursar en la política.

Prácticamente desde la primera guerra mundial, cada presidente de los EE.UU. tenía sus consejeros-asesores ZionTalmúdicos y esta tradición sigue siendo vigente hoy en día y de manera más voraz, pues está influencia nefasta se ha extendido al mundo de la ACADEMIA y al ámbito militar.  Allí están metido también y desde allí formulan proyectos, crean enemigos y proponen políticas de "Seguridad y Defensa Nacional". Todas estas actividades hegemónicas necesitan dinero y el dinero lo presta la Reserva Federal al Gobierno Federal US, los billetes verdes los imprime la Reserva Federal o uno de los Bancos afiliados a la misma, sin respaldo en NADA, ni oro, ni plata y la Reserva Federal controla prácticamente todos los Bancos Centrales occidentales, vía proxies, apátridas que le hacen la segunda en los respectivos países.

Ahora, lo que se quiere es establecer un orden mundial financiero político dirigido por la Gran Finanza ZionTalmúdica, que sirva sus intereses y que los Estados-Naciones desaparezcan y sean sustituidos por seudo-estados pequeños manejables y asfixiables  a voluntad si no marchan al son y sazón de Hava Naguila.

El problema para los ZionTalmúdicos  es doble: Los Musulmanes y los Chinos. Los Musulmanes son el único muro de contención que queda impermeable al avance hegemónico ZionTalmúdico. Su religión y sistema bancario no aceptan la USURA, prestar dinero con interés, y esto es una herejía muy grave para los ZionTalmúdicos, pues es de ello y de actividades conexas a la especulación bursátil que ellos viven. Ellos no generan plusvalía produciendo bienes, ellos crean productos financieros y servicios ligados a los mismos, construyen casinos, producen películas pornográficas, venden armas, en fin son dueños y/o financistas de todas las actividades parasitarias-periféricas, depravantes o bélicas.

Por ello, hay que derrumbar el Muro de Contención Musulmán,  para tener acceso a mercados que los están siendo cerrados y hacer lo mismo con los Chinos, los Pakistaní y los Indios, vía la Globalización.

Por ello no quieren que Irán sea capaz de defenderse con armas de disuasión o llegue a ser un ejemplo a seguir para otras naciones musulmanas. Por ello hay que cercar a China, y tenerla encajonada para que no sea ninguna amenaza para la hegemonía ZionTalmúdica. La intensificación de los cultivos del opium en Afganistán son parte del mismo plan y receta probada antes por los Ingleses. Lo que se está buscando con la OTAN es encontrar  una manera, sea directa o indirecta de FRACCIONAR a China. El Tíbet, los últimos incidentes en entre chinos musulmanes y etnias Han son parte del mismo plan de desestabilización de China, para que no sea una Potencia que pueda medirse con los Occidentales, es decir amenazar el orden geopolítico-monetario-financiero-económico establecido por el Imperio ZionTalmúdico.

Los ZionTalmúdicos tienen dos prioridades en este momento: el Desarme Nuclear de Pakistán, vía su desestabilización política y eventualmente alguna operación tipo comando combinada con la compra de políticos y militares pakistaní para facilitar a la OTAN la tarea, es decir la toma de las instalaciones nucleares pakistaní y, llevar a la Federación Rusa a hacer bloque con Occidente. Está tarea es la más difícil mientras Putin está vivo y en el poder.

Pues, el Petróleo de Medio Oriente es tan solo una ficha en el Plan maestro de dominio global financiero-monetario. Es lo que persigue el Conjunto Grupal ZionTalmúdico.

Ahmed Azeddine

www.tpsupremo.com & www.tpsupremo.8k.com

PRINT

Chomsky Says President Obama Continues Bush Policy To Control Middle East Oil
Date: November 03, 2009
Topic: Government & Politics

By Sherwood Ross /Staff Writer

Political activist Noam Chomsky says that although President Obama views the Iraq invasion merely as “a mistake” or “strategic blunder,” it is, in fact, a “major crime” designed to enable America to control the Middle East oil reserves.

“It’s (“strategic blunder”) probably what the German general staff was telling Hitler after Stalingrad,” Chomsky quipped, referring to the big Nazi defeat by the Soviet army in 1943.

“There is basically no significant change in the fundamental traditional conception that if we can control Middle East energy resources, then we can control the world,” he said.

In a lecture at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London Oct. 27th, Chomsky warned against expecting significant foreign policy changes from Obama, according to a report by Mamoon Alabbasi published on MWC News.net. Alabbasi is an editor at Middle East Online.

“As Obama came into office, (former Secretary of State) Condoleezza Rice predicted he would follow the policies of Bush’s second term, and that is pretty much what happened, apart from a different rhetorical style,” Chomsky said.

Chomsky said the U.S. operates under the “Mafia principle,” explaining “the Godfather does not tolerate ‘successful defiance’” and must be stamped out “so that others understand that disobedience is not an option.”

Despite pressure on the U.S. to withdraw from Iraq, Alabbasi reported, Chomsky said the U.S. continues to seek a long-term presence in the country and the huge U.S. embassy in Baghdad is to be expanded under Obama.

“As late as November, 2007, the U.S. was still insisting that the ‘Status of Forces Agreement’ allow for an indefinite U.S. military presence and privileged access to Iraq’s resources by U.S. investors,” Chomsky added. “Well, they didn’t get that on paper at least. They had to back down,” Alabbasi quotes him as saying.

Chomsky said Middle East oil reserves are understood to be “a stupendous source of strategic power” and “one of the greatest material prizes in world history.”

Concerning Iran, Chomsky said the U.S. acted to overthrow its parliamentary democracy in 1953 “to retain control of Iranian resources” and when the Iranians reasserted themselves in 1979, the U.S. acted “to support Saddam Hussein’s merciless invasion” of that country.

“The torture of Iran continued without a break and still does, with sanctions and other means,” Chomsky said. According to Alabbasi, Chomsky “mocked the idea” presented by mainstream media that a nuclear-armed Iran might attack nuclear-armed Israel. Iranian leaders would have to have a “fanatic death wish” to attack Israel, which reportedly has 200 nuclear weapons or more.

“The chance of Iran launching a missile attack, nuclear or not, is about at the level of an asteroid hitting the earth,” Chomsky said. He said the presence of U.S. anti-missile weapons in Israel are really meant for preparing a possible attack on Iran, not for self-defense, as they are often presented.

Chomsky is professor emeritus of linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

(Sherwood Ross is a Miami-based media consultant who formerly reported for the Chicago Daily News and worked as a columnist for wire services. Reach him at sherwoodross10@...)

This article comes from Veterans Today - News for U.S. Military Veterans Jobs, VA Benefits, Home Loans, Hospitals & Administration
http://www.veteranstoday.com

The URL for this story is:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=9244

Comments    Visit the Discussion Forum

By Azeddine on 2009-11-04 17:08:00

Prof. Noam Chomsky has been outspoken about geopolitics issues for decades. Time and world events have proven him mostly right in his adopted positions. Though, the idea of controlling the Middle East oil is not the final objective. It is meant, in the long run, to prevent China from getting access to it. Actually the USA and Europe can do without oil from both Iraq and Iran. The technology is at hand even to substitute other sources of energy to the fossil ones. The concern in the USA is about what a future highly industrialized China might do to the World Monetary-financial System and the Rules of the WTO and GATT, established to suite the interests of the banksters owning the Federal Reserve and the Wall Street Capital and Securities businesses-‘financial products’. That is why the US Foreign Policy is controlled by the AIPAC Lobby or JEWISH LOBBY (I do not like the term "Jewish Lobby", given that there are many Jews, Authentic Jews, who are against the "Zion-Talmudists" (= Zionists who want to apply the Talmudic Laws to the non-Jews, i.e. Elected People vs. Goyim), who represent Big Finance and the Armament Industry Contractors). See Professors Mearheimer & Waltz paper about "The Influence of The Jewish Lobby in American Foreign Policy", for more details. Said Control is aimed at establishing the same MONETARY & FINANCIAL SYSTEM, that impoverished this country (USA), --and recently brought havoc in Europe and Scandinavia--, in the Middle East, Eastern Europe and especially China and India, to rip these country off, now that the job has been successfully done in the USA and GB... The war is about GLOBALIZATION before China gets strong enough to have its say in global affairs. There were no terrorists whatsoever in Iraq until the country was invaded by the USA-GB against the recommendations of the UN and the protests of France and Germany. The Taliban Government said “hand over to us the proof that Osama Bin Laden was involved in the 9/11 disaster and we will turn him over to you”… Facts that stand undisputed to this day.

[ Reply to This ]